EVERY source is “influenced,” which is why it’s so important to diversify your sources to get a better picture of the full story. Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a hell of a job trying to be as impartial as is possible when humans are involved. If you still don’t trust them, that’s fine - but don’t trust your preferred side to give you the full story, either - or not try to slant the story towards propaganda to take advantage of confirmation bias for their own purposes.
EVERY source is “influenced,” which is why it’s so important to diversify your sources to get a better picture of the full story. Wikipedia may not be perfect, but it does a hell of a job trying to be as impartial as is possible when humans are involved. If you still don’t trust them, that’s fine - but don’t trust your preferred side to give you the full story, either - or not try to slant the story towards propaganda to take advantage of confirmation bias for their own purposes.
LOL
Wow. Such an impressive intellectual “rebuttal” - incredibly well researched, and thoughtful.
🙄 Pathetic.
it has all the effort it deserves
FTFY
Who counts as “humans” in this sentence?
Apparently not you, in all your glorious perfection.
Who else doesn’t count as humans in your holy scripture?
People who confuse “holy scripture” with reality, as you just did.