Cliparr 3.0: audio exports and custom subtitles | Cliparr
cliparr.dev
Cliparr 3.0 brings audio exports, custom subtitle tracks, live Plex and Jellyfin dashboard updates, and versioned JSON metadata for your clips.

What is Cliparr?

A tool for creating clips from media playing on your Plex or Jellyfin server. Perfect for memes, soundboards, content creators, and more.

What’s New in 3.0?

  • Audio-only export supporting multiple formats (mp3, ogg, wav, flac, m4a).
  • Custom subtitles. You can now arbitrarily add custom subtitles/captions, regardless of whether the source contains any.
  • Improved metadata embedded into exports. Now includes a versioned metadata schema.
  • Security improvements.
  • Performance improvements.

Mentions on the web

Recently listed on selfh.st, the self-hosted application directory.

Pick of the week on the Linux Unplugged podcast.

This is the best pick of my life

It’s life-changing

What is perhaps the best web interface for editing clips I have ever seen

The folks on the Linux Unplugged podcast had amazing things to say, check out their full episode.

Links

  • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    104·
    2 days ago

    It doesn’t look like its in bad faith at all.

    With that label, I default to vibe code unless specified otherwise in the post. Its not really up to use to be invstegators. Especially non programmers. They rely on questions like that to understand if its vibe coded or not.

    Its like saying people should read the scripts they download before they run them. And like yes, but if the goal is adoption, you need to account for those who dont know what to look for.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneEnglish
      6·
      21 hours ago

      This is a deeply unserious take.

      Assuming the worst when someone has proactively disclosed is a strange way to encourage disclosure.

      You admit to having no way of checking. Fine. So, if OP hadn’t in good faith used AIP, or had taken a millisecond to add agents.md to .gitignore, you wouldn’t have known - and you’d have had nothing to say.

      Again, agents.md is not an indicator of vibe coding. If the entirety of your due diligence is spotting that file or running slopscan, we’re better off not tagging at all.

      The position you’re defending punishes honesty and rewards non-disclosure. That’s not a reasonable default. That’s backwards.

      • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        13·
        21 hours ago

        You want to know why i assumed the worst? Because it was left unspecified.

        I’m not going to single handily vet every single slop project like a sleuth. I expect honest disclosures. If they’re not, then there’s no room in a good faith community like this.

        I assume the worst until specified otherwise. Why is it on me to be a detective, and not just you know, say how AI was used in the project in the post. That would have prevented this entire conversation.

        I see no reason not to assume something isn’t vibe coded until specified otherwise. Because it’s a filter that helps me filter out this community. I read a post, and maybe a couple of comments. If its not specified, I move on.

        If you want better disclosures, then do that. Dont wait for mods, just fucking do it yourself.

        • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneEnglish
          4·
          21 hours ago

          So -

          • Don’t disclose - slop
          • Disclose with AIP - not specific enough, still assume slop
          • Disclose more specifically - “why didn’t you just do that?”

          There’s no disclosure OP could have made that you would have accepted in good faith then? And “just do it yourself” - you mean like OP did with AIP?

          Weird logic, friend.

          • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
            13·
            20 hours ago

            I would have accepted a section on how AI was used in the project post. I’m not here to click every link and check myself.

            What would you have me assume from the tag alone? Or from the entire post?

            • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneEnglish
              4·
              20 hours ago

              And yet you called it slop. Twice. Before asking.

              You also describe yourself as successful software developer

              A developer who can’t evaluate whether something is vibe coded without a dedicated prose section, but is comfortable calling it slop on sight.

              What exactly are you caviling against here?

              • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
                12·
                20 hours ago

                So you didn’t answer the question, and instead lobbied personal attacks. And I’m the one not acting in good faith?

                Edit: the question was asked, and ignored.

                Next, I never said I couldnt, I said I won’t. Because ain’t no one got time for that. Least of all me.

                So again, reading the post here, what would you have me assume?

                Third, seriously, find better material.

                • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneEnglish
                  3·
                  19 hours ago

                  Citing your own words back to you isn’t a personal attack. This entire thread has been your claim that “non-programmers can’t evaluate things.” Now, cornered by your own post, you admit you can, you just choose not to and called slop anyway.

                  Then claimed it wasn’t in bad faith.

                  OP doesn’t owe you any more disclosure than the forum rules say they do - and frankly, you shouldn’t need it.

                  They do however require you to be civil. Calling someone else’s work slop and telling me I’ve lobbed personal attacks (cite them) or egging me on to “find better material” (whatever that means) falls short.