time2lose@lemmy.world to interestingasfuck@lemmy.world · 15 hours agoHe wanted out of life subscriptions so badlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1200arrow-down15
arrow-up1195arrow-down1imageHe wanted out of life subscriptions so badlemmy.worldtime2lose@lemmy.world to interestingasfuck@lemmy.world · 15 hours agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareeurodyne@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down13·10 hours agoThe way you twist the meaning of the word in order to rationalize your offense is pretty disgusting If you can rationalize that, you could rationalize anything
minus-squareprole@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 hours agoWhat? How are they twisting the word, the person they replied to said murder was a form of theft.
minus-squareJimbabwe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·9 hours agoHis take on the broken window fallacy is pretty hilarious. “Theft can be good because it might create jobs in the woefully underfunded insurance industry! Won’t somebody please think of the insurers?!”
The way you twist the meaning of the word in order to rationalize your offense is pretty disgusting
If you can rationalize that, you could rationalize anything
What? How are they twisting the word, the person they replied to said murder was a form of theft.
His take on the broken window fallacy is pretty hilarious. “Theft can be good because it might create jobs in the woefully underfunded insurance industry! Won’t somebody please think of the insurers?!”