time2lose@lemmy.world to interestingasfuck@lemmy.world · 14 hours agoHe wanted out of life subscriptions so badlemmy.worldimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down15
arrow-up1190arrow-down1imageHe wanted out of life subscriptions so badlemmy.worldtime2lose@lemmy.world to interestingasfuck@lemmy.world · 14 hours agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squareeurodyne@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down9·6 hours agoBut they aren’t. And it is. You can’t just dismiss reality when it becomes inconvenient, and if your morals are so “flexible”, you might as well not have any at all.
minus-squarectrl_alt_esc@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up13·5 hours agoYou have it backward. What’s legal or not is not the same as what’s ethical or moral. Their morals aren’t flexible, quite the opposite. They just recognise where the law is wrong.
But they aren’t. And it is.
You can’t just dismiss reality when it becomes inconvenient, and if your morals are so “flexible”, you might as well not have any at all.
You have it backward. What’s legal or not is not the same as what’s ethical or moral. Their morals aren’t flexible, quite the opposite. They just recognise where the law is wrong.