Yeah. I don’t think you know what any of those words actually mean. You’re as intellectual dishonesty as it gets.

Oh, I see. You really can’t read. Not surprising at all.

All you’re doing is confirming that you didn’t read shit, because every one of those articles supports my argument.

The Euromaidan protests were a direct response to Yanukovich refusing to sign the European Union–Ukraine Association Agreement.

If you’re claiming that’s not what I’ve been saying all along…then you really can’t read.

Oh, I see. You think I “made up” all those articles? That’s the excuse you’re going with? smh.

If you want “evidence” of historical events, and won’t accept news articles dated at the time of those events…then you are in denial. That’s a “you” problem, buddy.

Denial is not a valid argument.

Burden of proof? For publicly available details that everyone at the time witnessed? Lol! Ok.

Here’s one that I already posted.

Here’s another.

And another.

Here’s one from a Ukranian source.

And this is even a political thesis someone wrote about it.

You act like you’ve never heard any of this before. How is that possible, when you have such strong opinions about it? It seems a little disingenuous that you would know nothing at all about what you are talking about, when you say I’m the one making shit up.

I’m pretty sure you have access to the internet? You know you can look this shit up…right? It’s not hard, man.

Lol! You’re skeptical about the events that took place?

Buddy, how do you even have an opinion about this, without even knowing what happened leading up to the protests? If you don’t understand the context, then your “opinions” are meaningless. You’re just repeating propaganda. You can’t even make a coherent argument against what I’m telling you, can you? All you can do is respond with more memes, and baseless objections.

Try making even a single point that actually fits the facts.

What am I lying about?

Yanukovich was elected on the promise that he would continue to strengthen ties with the EU, and sign the EU–Ukraine Association Agreement. An agreement that had been negotiated over the course of many years, and was already approved by both sides. When he suddenly refused to sign it at the last minute, people all across the country lost their shit, and took to the streets to demand his removal from office.

Not one word of that is a lie. Those are just facts.

Like I said, the CIA didn’t need to orchestrate anything. Russia and Yanukovich made those protests happen all by themselves.

The only ones “making shit up” are the ones saying this was some kind of CIA operation. Why would the CIA need to get involved in something that Russia and Yanukovich made inevitable.

I remember when Ukraine’s president reversed decades of policy, that he was specifically elected to enact…leading to protests and riots, demanding his removal from office. The US had nothing to do with that…Russia did.

Remember when Russia kept accusing Europe of fear-mongering, when people said Russia was planning on invading Ukraine for months leading up to them actually invading Ukraine. And then they continued to deny that they actually invaded Ukraine for months, after they actually invaded Ukraine?

Yeah. Here we go again.