PErsonally I feel that this is why I reject ALL reforms. Yes ALL reforms. Even the pro-socialosm ones.

In my opinion pro-socialistic reforms after pro-socialistic reforms are just reforms that extend rhe life of capitalism by paying temporarybconcessions to pissed off, super exploited members of the proletariat. ALSO something tjat Ive noticed is that people will often chalk up pro-socialistic reforms as a ‘better form of capitalism than what we previouslt had’ …when its clearly a socialistic policy… Has anyome seen anything that proves me wrong about this particular point? cause I havent been able to find anything.

Something Ive found awful about humanity is that humans tend to not steike out into violent, necessary revolution unless they have nother choice but to do so. So if things get bad enough people will surely the people will want to strike out sooner, no? You cam call me an acclerationist but I also reject accelerationism too. In my opinion humans are very capable of putting themselges in chains under capitalistic and fascistic leaders so there is no need to accelerate anything cause humans , as stupid as we are , are already accelerating towards our doom or our Proletarian Revolutions

Personally I want to see humanity make its own stupid , sefl-destructive decisions and from these decisions they have ar series of ‘Revelations’ as to how the socialists were always right all along . And from there the people organically from themselves become socialostic .And when the majirity of people are just organically socialistic you dont have to put in too much work to keep the revolution going because the average person will be putting in that work for you and for their communities. The Regolutions become self-sustaining in this one scenario

Its like the difference between radical feminism and proletariam feminism

radical feminism only wants to liberate some women within the confines of capitalistic socoety . So instead of the 8 richest billionaires being all White men radical feminists want it to be so that a disabled Indian , an autistic Guinea person, 5 non-binary Russians, and a White Norwegian man are the 8 richest billionaires.

A proletarian feminist doesnt eant there to be ANY billionaires. They want to see the liberation of all genders from all patriarchal and capitalistic propaganda about each of the genders that we have chosen to place on each gender… and part of that means that each person of each gender has enough to survive AND thrive…and part of that means the eliminations of all those who can hoard billions of dollars s in resources

ya this is why violent socialism is the only form of socialism to make the news.

NOT.A.SINGLE. democratic socialist group in human history has ever been able to make lasting changes to benefit ALL of the proletariat…so nothing changes when these democratic socialists implement reform after reform after reform after reform after…

Cause reforms do not destroy the current capitalistic systems in place ina. region that impoverish and propagandize the proletariat. Reform after reform after reform is like a shark swimming kn a fragile glass box. When the sharl is finally violent and headbutts the glass repeatedly it can finally break throughband swim to the rest of the ocean

Only violent proletarian revooution has ever been able to do this.

Those Sri Lankans just elected some democratic ‘socialist’ leaders in their bourgeoise elections and we shall see the problems that plagued Sri Lanka be alleviated for a short. while…only to be resurged!

(FYI you should ban me now cause Im not going to change my mind about this.)

Ill just say that from a personal standpoint I dont see ANY form of ‘socialism’ that doesnt involve the mass trial then slaughter of the bourgeoisie , their pigs, and the divvying up of their stolen resources as socialism for ME. I dont see it as socialism. Me. Everyome who is complicit with the bourgeoisie will have to pay for their crimes, except kids of course. Even I will , if Ive dome anything. (though seeing as how Ive been impoverished most of my life I doubt it)

So no , youre not gonna ‘elect’ MY socialistic leaders. I dont even care if the socialist party where Im at wins the bourgeoise elections. Unless I see a mass slaughter of bourgeoisie and their collaborators? Then IDGAF about whatvever form of ‘socialism’ you call it.

Thats the only reason Ill never be a democratic socialist. I dont see non-violent socialism or communistic transitions as worthy of my time. Thats just how Ive alwsys been.

probably saw its parents get ran over by a car and it did what it had to do to protect its cubs. Based.

He says that anarchism isnt possible after capitalism…

And Imma keep it 💯 with yall, who here can prove to me that anarchism isnt next? (and no I dont mean anarcho-capitalism or any of the other dumbass fascistic forms of anarchism - I meam forreal FORREALS anarchism)

Im not saying that anarchism is better than communism. Id say Im more of an anarcho-communist as I see grassroots movements , even grassroots counterrevolutionary movements , as more useful than authoritarian ones from a few leaders . I just feel that it is better for each of the peoole to think for themselves, consult researchers or their own research for themselves, AND to act collectively or even not act based on what they themselves feel rather than what a community leader or group of community leaders tells them to feel. To be completely honest the main reason I am an communist rather than an anarchist is cause I feel that collective violent groups of communists will be better at imprisoning, and re-educating middle aged fascists than collective, violent groups of anarchists.

Yall remember how he aid we dont own anything already? Show a capitalist or fascist his video and their brain will start melting loool!

“This wasnt a deliberate act”

But the construction, enforcement , upkeep of car centric transportation infrastructure certainly is deliberate. 😑

R.I.P.